Crypto: The Only Currency Powered Entirely by Vibes
Cryptocurrency was supposed to free us from corrupt institutions, greedy banks, and centralized control. What it actually did was recreate all of that, minus the customer service number and plus a cartoon ape. Somewhere between “financial revolution” and “trust me, bro,” the pitch got a little thin.
At first, it sounded noble. Digital money for a digital age. No middlemen. No gatekeepers. Just math, transparency, and a brave new future. Then it immediately turned into a casino where everyone swears they’re a long-term investor while refreshing their phone every twelve seconds like a lab rat hitting a lever for dopamine.
The most impressive part is how little substance is required to keep it alive. You don’t need profits, products, or even a coherent explanation. You just need confidence, jargon, and a YouTube thumbnail where some guy looks shocked next to an arrow pointing up. The technology is “complex,” the white paper is “coming,” and if you don’t understand it, that’s on you for being old and afraid of progress.
Crypto didn’t eliminate trust — it just relocated it. Instead of trusting a bank that’s been around for a century, you’re trusting a 22-year-old named Tyler who tweets rocket emojis and lives with three roommates. But it’s fine, because he says “decentralized” a lot and once used the word “protocol” in a sentence.
Every crash is treated like a misunderstanding. “Zoom out,” they say, as if perspective magically replaces value. “It’s still early,” which is an interesting claim for something that’s been around long enough to have multiple scandals, documentaries, and congressional hearings. If traditional finance behaved like this, people would be in prison instead of podcasts.
And the culture around it is even better. Any criticism is dismissed as ignorance. Any skepticism means you “don’t get it.” Losses aren’t losses — they’re “temporary drawdowns.” Bankruptcy isn’t failure — it’s “restructuring.” When money disappears, it didn’t vanish, it was “hacked,” which is crypto-speak for “someone took it and there’s nothing you can do.”
What really separates crypto from past financial manias is the moral superiority. This isn’t just investing — it’s a belief system. Doubters aren’t cautious; they’re enemies of innovation. Regulators aren’t doing their jobs; they’re oppressors. And when the whole thing implodes, it’s never the fault of the system — it’s bad actors, bad timing, or the moon being in the wrong house.
The irony is that the same people screaming about freedom and decentralization desperately want mass adoption. They want governments to recognize it, institutions to legitimize it, and everyone else to buy in so the price goes up. Nothing says independence like begging the system you hate to validate your spreadsheet.
None of this is to say there’s no interesting technology underneath it all. There probably is. But it’s been buried under layers of hype, scams, and performative confidence so thick you need a machete to get through it. Whatever promise crypto had, it’s now chained to influencers, pump-and-dumps, and a never-ending cycle of reinvention to avoid admitting the obvious.
If your financial future depends on everyone else believing harder, that’s not an economy — it’s a group project with no adult supervision. And history suggests those don’t end well, no matter how many rockets you draw on the chart.
Crypto didn’t replace money. It replaced skepticism with hope and called it progress.